<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
><channel><title>Black Hills Railway Society | George Bauder | Activity</title><link>https://bhrs.club/members/trainmangebgmail-com/activity/</link> <atom:link href="https://bhrs.club/members/trainmangebgmail-com/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /> <description>Activity feed for George Bauder.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 13:12:14 -0700</lastBuildDate> <generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator> <language>en-US</language> <ttl>30</ttl> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency> <item> <guid
isPermaLink="false">677de96088239a8111370380d0d9be8d</guid><title>George Bauder replied to the topic Layout Expansion in the forum HO Scale Layout</title><link>https://bhrs.club/forums/topic/layout-expansion/#post-13334</link> <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2020 13:39:08 -0700</pubDate><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Without question the ideas are both exciting and challenging.  Creativity is essential to model railroading.  I would advise that before anything happens to the HO layout, a thorough and exhaustive planning process be initiated to ENSURE that the N scale is brought to a renewed status.  So much has been done for the HO scale pike and nothing for&hellip;<span
class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-24"><a
href="https://bhrs.club/forums/topic/layout-expansion/#post-13334" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item> <guid
isPermaLink="false">2161b6844bd8d85bd9fbb93619dce8d2</guid><title>George Bauder became a registered member</title><link>https://bhrs.club/activity/p/17/</link> <pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2020 13:01:36 -0700</pubDate> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>